Unlocking Research. University of Cambridge Workplace of Scholarly Correspondence

Unlocking Research. University of Cambridge Workplace of Scholarly Correspondence

It is difficult getting a night out together (of book)

The Office of Scholarly Communication is publishing a series of blog posts on open access and open research as part of Open Access Week. In this article Maria Angelaki defines just just how challenging it can be to interpret book dates showcased on some writers’ internet sites.

Significantly more than three months per year. That’s how time that is much invest doing absolutely absolutely nothing but determining the publication date associated with articles we procedure in the great outdoors Access group.

Become clear in what our company is referring to here: All we have to understand for HEFCE conformity is whenever the Version that is final of ended up being provided in the publisher’s web site. Additionally, when there is a version that is printed of log, for the very own metadata, we must understand the problem book date too.

Clearly, it can’t be that difficult.

Determining book date

The Policy for available access in analysis Excellence framework calls for the deposit of author’s outputs within 3 months of acceptance. Nevertheless, the very first 2 yrs of the policy has allowed deposits because belated as 90 days through the date of book.

It seems simple does not it? But just what does “date of book” suggest? Relating to HEFCE the Date of Publication of the log article is “the earliest date that the last version-of-record is created available in the publisher’s internet site. This generally ensures that the ‘early online’ date, as opposed to the print book date, should really be taken since the date of book.”

We input the acceptance date, the online publication date and the publication date when we create a record in Apollo, the University of Cambridge’s institutional repository. Continue reading “Unlocking Research. University of Cambridge Workplace of Scholarly Correspondence”